RESUMEN
Normal aging is associated with significant deleterious cerebrovascular changes; these have been implicated in disease pathogenesis and increased susceptibility to ischemic injury. While these changes are well documented in the brain, few studies have been conducted in the spinal cord. Here, we utilize specialized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging to investigate age-related changes in cervical spinal vascular anatomy and hemodynamics in male Fisher 344 rats, a common strain in aging research. Aged rats (24-26 mo., N=6) exhibited significant tortuosity in the anterior spinal artery and elevated vascular resistance compared to adults (4-6 mo., N=6; tortuosity index 2.20±0.15 vs 4.74±0.45, p<0.05). Baseline blood volume was lower in both larger vessels and the microcirculation in the aged cohort, specifically in white matter (4.44e14±1.37e13 vs 3.66e14±2.64e13 CEUS bolus AUC, p<0.05). To elucidate functional differences, animals were exposed to a hypoxia challenge; whereas adult rats exhibited significant functional hyperemia in both gray and white matter (GM: 1.13±0.10-fold change from normoxia, p<0.05; WM: 1.16±0.13, p<0.05), aged rats showed no response. Immunohistochemistry revealed reduced pericyte coverage and activated microglia behavior in aged rats, which may partially explain the lack of vascular response. This study provides the first in vivo description of age-related hemodynamic differences in the cervical spinal cord.
RESUMEN
Changes in the brain and spinal cord microvasculature during normal aging contribute to the "sensitive" nature of aged central nervous system tissue to ischemic insults. In this review, we will examine alterations in the central nervous system microvasculature during normal aging, which we define as aging without a dominant pathology such as neurodegenerative processes, vascular injury or disease, or trauma. We will also discuss newer technologies to improve the study of central nervous system microvascular structure and function. Microvasculature within the brain and spinal cord will be discussed separately as anatomy and physiology differ between these compartments. Lastly, we will identify critical areas for future studies as well as key unanswered questions.
